Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Page properties
idAttendees-R20.0


Attendees

 



Dave MilhamTM Forum
Ton Brand (ETSI)ETSI
klaus_martiny
Klaus Martiny (Deutsche Telekom)ETSI
Kevin McDonnell ( Huawei)TM Forum
luigi licciardi
Luigi Licciardi (
HUawei
Huawei)TM Forum
Zoulan
z00340018 HUawei
Huawei3GPP
Dr. Muslim Elkotob (
Vodaphone(
Vodafone)IEEE
Ranganai chaparadzaIEEE
Kevin McDonnell (Huawei)TM Forum
Klaus Moschner
NGNM
NGMN
Raymond Forbes
rwx651084
ETSi
ETSI
Luca PesandoETSI
Thoma Tovinger3GPP



Apologies


Bridge Details

  Supplied directly to  SDO leads  as restricted to formal SDO representatives.

...

  • Introduction
  • Permission to record.
  • Agenda review and location of input contributions.IPR proposal for joint work items:
    • Overview
    • Proposal to set up legal team meeting.
  • Feedback on Letter of Intent (formerly MoU)
    • LoI announcement of work  
    • Agreements needed to share, review and approved the Joint White Paper 
  • Overview /review of Work package progress
    • WP02 Joint WP addressing proposal in Roadmap and Landscape (Operational use caseWP02. Work Packages (WP)
      • Working page set up Need to identify SDO results / plans on Autonomous Levels
      • Relationship to operational models
    • WP04 Common operating principle
    • Topics Matrix Topic / SDO Matrix
  • Administrative 
    • White Paper proposal based on topics table
    • Review /agree meeting schedule proposal Multi-SDO AN Meeting Schedules
    • Reorganize joint working area
  • AOB

...

  • Introduction
    • Meeting is a formal meeting between SDO representatives
    • Record of attendees made and listed above. 
  • Permission to record
    • Request to record made - granted  recording attached above. 
  • Agenda review and location of input contributions.
  • IPR proposal for joint work items:
    • Overview
      • Goal is to create a copyright and  license agreement for jointly produced works i.e. White papers as proposed in the work packages. ( Not intended to cover LoI see later).
      • Agreement is we to make this a per deliverable work package agreement  rather than a multi an multi SDO comprehensive liaison agreement. Reason is not all SDO may contribute to all WP so make is simpler and quicker to set up. 
      • Proposal to convene a SDO  legal team meeting In first or second week of September.
      • This was generally applauded and noted that the legal agreement might have an impact on what goes in the Work package results.
      • Noted we will need to give the legal representative some scope statement of what we are trying to achieve i.e creating work package outputs that take in SDO member agreed documents carrying out some analysis and critique with observations and recommendations ( i.e not creating standards or being a SDO).
      • AP Dave Milham will send out letter of invitation to the Formal SDO representative for the legal representatives meeting
      • Noted that the IPR arrangement for Letter of Intent (LoI) should be handled separately as this more like statement of direction ( like press release)
      • Agreement that we need to progress both the Letter of Intent and the legal discussion for work package output concurrently. However, we probable need to agree the LoI before finalizing the WP  outputs.
  • Feedback on Letter of Intent (formerly MoU)
    • LoI announcement of work  
      • Noted that some confusion over scope of work proposed. 
      • Need to set a deadline for initial comments.  
      • Suggestion is 6th Sept, so that we can start to process comments and update the proposal in response to feedback. 
      • Noted that current version is open to interpretation and could be thought of as setting up a new SDO and developing concrete specifications.
      • Agreed that this was not the intention - The goals of  WPs are analysis of  current situation and provide a report on issues and possible harmonization resolution . e.g convergence of AN Levels definitions.
      • Really important to clarify scope of work and deliverable outputs. 
    • Agreements needed to share, review and approve the Joint White Paper. 
      • Need comments on the LoI by 6th September, so we can review and update the proposal.
      • Also important in a letter of intent to make sure that we set expectations accurately and not overpromise. I.e aim for simplicity and limited scope.
      • Press release is something we can decide separately after we have an agreed LoI
  • Overview /review of Work package progress
    • WP02 Joint WP addressing proposal in Roadmap and Landscape (Operational use caseWP02. Work Packages (WP)

...

Previous call

  •  AP TMForum Dave Milham  update MoU draft update MoU draft to be a Letter of Intent (LoI).
  •  AP TM Forum  send a liaison within two days  with LoI request comment with LoI request comment and feedback  on the Letter of Intent within 2 weeks. 
  •  AP ALL SDO to provide initial comment on the proposal by the 5th July   and indicate when they could formally agree to the Letter of Intent ( will depend on each SDO internal procedures.
  •  AP TM Forum will draft an MSDO IPR  proposal for review and agreement  by liaison.
  •  AP TM Forum will set up a working confluence page based on structure in WP05 and invite contributions
  •  AP TM Forum will make changes to the schedule on meeting page Multi-SDO AN Meeting Schedules
  •  AP IEEE will make a proposal for the contents of such Common Operational Principles document 

...