Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: partial draft

Date

Not Fully Curated

Page properties
idAttendees-R20.0


Attendees


...

Meeting Agenda·I

  • Introduction
  • Permission to record.
  • Agenda review and location of input contributions. Review progress on the Leagla Legal / IPR agreement proposal
    • Legal team meeting 13th September
    • Proposal sent out on 5th October
    • Feedback
    • Conclusions and next steps
  • Overview /review of Work package progress
  • Administrative 
    • Review /agree meeting schedule proposal Multi-SDO AN Meeting Schedules
    • Reorganise
    • Reorganize joint working area
  • AOB

Call for IPR Declaration – IPR Statements for Use in Meetings

...

Password: MSDO13

Meeting notes

  • Introduction
    • Open meeting 
    • Apologies received from Thomas Tovinger and Zoulan as re-schcedule meeting clashes with SA5 meeting
    • Roll call added above
  • Permission to record.  Requested and granted
  • Agenda review and location of input contributions. Review progress on the Leagla / IPR agreement proposal
    • Legal team meeting 13th September
    • Proposal sent out on 5th October
    • Feedback
      • In response to the liaison we sent 5th Oct on a proposed Participation Agreement which would be used for all joint documents. developed through MSDO.
      • 3GPP
      • FG-AN see 2021-09-13 ITU FNAN liaison sp16-fg-an-oLS-00006 
        • Indicated that as they are a time limited activity they don't believe it will be possible to sign up to joint documents.
      • ONAP 
        • have indicated that they would prefer to try to work through current bilateral agreement between Linux Foundation and TM Forum.
      • ETSI
        • Ton reported that ETSI have had a general discussion and had a call with TM Forum Legal. ETSI doesn't believe there is an unsurmountable IPR agreement issue.
        • They would like to get the lapsed ETSI TM Forum Liaison agreement re-established as that would support both AN and NON AN related liaisons. 
    • Conclusions and next steps
      • Dave suggested that the original intention of a co-jointly authored documents and a public letter of intent is clearly infeasible across all the Interested SDOs.
      • The earlier suggestion  of common meeting with temporary document form multiple SDO and jointly reviewed had raised some issues in TM Forum  about antitrust as not clear under which SDO's charter  the discussions were being conducted. 
      • Nick Sampson , Magnus Buhrgard Ranganai Chaparadza, Muslim Elkotob, Raymond Forbes  all stated that the early exchange of information was of considerable value to all SDOs  and that there was a desire to keep those information exchanges going.
      • Dave suggested an alternative variant of the temp Document approach  which was to use the meeting to conduct open meetings to  review contributions from each of SDO's. The difference from the previous proposal is that for each document produced by a single SDO the review is conducted under the charter IPR of the contributing SDO.  This means there is never any doubt which charter IPR a discussion is conducted under . Such an approach could  speed up liaison and dissemination  of  information sharing.
      • AP Dave Milham will write up this proposal for consideration By SDO at the next meeting due 20th Dec 2021.
  • Overview /review of Work package progress
  • Administrative 
    • Review /agree meeting schedule proposal Multi-SDO AN Meeting Schedules
    • Reorganize joint working area
  • AOB


Action List

Current CallAP Dave Milham will send out letter of invitation to the Formal SDO representative for the legal representatives meeting

...